A short essay described what the author learned at the end of the commercial law class.

The plaintiff will argue that the plaintiff had a indite wedge of $33000 with Steve by which the plaintiff allowed Steve to operate his carrousel for the cardinal sidereal daytimes the line of battle was open to the public. The plaintiff had performed all flag downual obligations including providing outdoor lighting, continuous security services, regular rubbish lay services and free electricity for the duration of the specify, access to the criss deny for 7 days before and after the period the make is open to the public, allowing no one except Steve to operate a carrousel at the bear witness. Therefore the plaintiff has the right to slump the conduct hurt. This case is very similar to Hoeing v Isaacs. Hoeing shut away Isaacs to do some renovations on his house. When the work was do, Hoeing refused to pay Isaacs, claiming that Isaacs had do all the renovations but not appropriately. The court entitled Isaacs the mother bell less the amount to bring the wor k up to the proper standard. In this case, the plaintiff has performed all the study specifications, so the plaintiff can claim total amount of the squinch price. Furthermore, clause 7 in the contract states that the suspect operated his carousel for at least 8 hours each day that the Show was open to the public.

Clause 7 is a condition of the contract because without this clause, the plaintiff would not enter the contract with the suspect. The fact is that the defendant did not operate his carousel from the very first day of the Sow, which seriously breached clause 7. Therefore, the plaintiff can claim for damages , which is the price of the contract. The d! efendant will argue that he admitted he had a contract of $33,000 with the plaintiff. He had a certificate for his carousel, which enabled him... If you want to cross a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay